Before you ask; no, it is not a line from the latest video game or movie. It is a description of what we see on the mat many times as-to whether a deshi can be trained to be responsive to actual attacks.
One of our senior players once had a conversation with another Yudansha and basically told him that he should not get in a fight with anyone as the outcome might not be to his advantage; as-in he would likely get his butt kicked. As related, the conversation went on to describe the three primary responses to a threat that suddenly occurs with those three responses not being the more normally cited “Fight or Flight” but instead, “Fight, Flight, or Freeze”. The deshi in question has the “Freeze” response to the point at which when I would work to train him in randori and put my hand in his face his eyes would get big and he would jerk back like I had rubbed my feet on the carpet and had given him some “static shock”.
The first two responses are obvious in what they are. You get attacked and don’t have any real time in which to decide what to do so you automatically fight the threat (and hopefully you’ve had some training). In the second you instinctively run. Sometimes taking flight is the better part of valor if you are able.
The first two choices of fight or flight (run or fight to survive) both stand the better chance of survival for the organism (that’s you) and many consider them part of the natural evolutionary process of what Darwin referred to as “survival of the species”. Fighting may get you hurt but sometimes it works well and the ability to stand and face-off (showing the attacker that you are willing) can stop the conflict to begin with, so there is that. Flight may mean they chase you down from behind but if you run fast enough it may not matter and then if unable to escape and realizing that it can’t be avoided you switch into Fight mode.
Freeze on the other hand poses a whole different set of problems not the least of which is what happens. You might have been able to fight your way out of it or run your way out of it but instead, you Freeze like a rabbit trying to hide under a bush from that circling hawk. The hawk sees lunch and by not moving you in effect have become a selection on the cafeteria food line. Then when the attacker lands that first blow, it becomes game over.
The whole of humanity as a broad average likely leans toward the Flight response due to inner fears over being able to handle the situation (especially after an intuitive evaluation with the recognition of the superiority of the attacker) and sometimes due to upbringing such as being trained to avoid conflict by negotiating or apologizing.
Unfortunately however, there are those attackers who have little interest in either negotiations or apologies. This is what martial arts and training in self-defense is supposed to teach and give us; the ability to Fight or at a minimum, the ability to stay calm long enough to evaluate the situation and recognize when Fight is possible and when Flight (or conflict avoidance) might be a better choice.
What does Killer instinct consist of, where is it, what is it? Basically, it is the ability to savagely address the threat, to run towards the gunfire, to react aggressively to stop the problem. It is either totally instinctual, or readily trainable, or just not there.
It was once said that Charles Manson was part of that 5% or so of the population that is naturally and automatically violent. Remember that the Bell Curve dictates that at the bottom a certain percentage are just murderous psychopaths without remorse for their actions and at the top a certain percentage is completely “Love is Now” and would not step on a cockroach even if it bit them and tore off a toe. All the rest of us fall somewhere (by degrees) in the middle of the curves’ hump.
So, if the psychopaths are “always sitting on ready and rocking on go” and might be the bottom 5% of the Bell Curve and the non-violent to the point of consciously not engaging in self-defense (the “Love is Now” folks) are at the other end and are roughly 5% (just to pick an estimate) where do the rest of us fall?
Without any viable studies to lean on but having trained in and taught martial arts (and having by necessity to study and evaluate the student population) for some 50 years, I’d simply use 1/3rd, 1/3rd, and a 1/3rd; one third are easy to provoke to fight, one third are hesitant but will with sufficient provocation, and one third will freeze in place and suffer the consequences.
Who goes in the first third? That would be military personnel, special forces (rangers, SEAL’s, Military Police), civilian police and law enforcement, martial sports competitors (boxing, wrestling, MMA, UFC). This group while not blatantly violent does not shy away from violence or self-defense. They are easy to train and with some guidance make competent martial artists who become disciplined.
The second third would be civilians who do not choose professions where violence is required but with some training and personal focus and discipline can become very effective at self-defense. They may hesitate somewhat before engaging and may even in some cases have to take a few before getting angry enough to engage but once initiated, they don’t back off.
The third “third” are those who freeze. They may go to a dojo and train in kata and maybe even some light randori but never shiai. They may take lessons in “non-contact” boxing or some simple self-defense classes but bottom line, when suddenly attacked their brain turns off. They might eventually choose to fight and to self-defend but only after massive and severe threats and injury to themselves and possibly to those around them.
So what does this mean and how does a dojo fit into this. As Mushashi and many others have said, “How you train is how you fight”. The only viable self-defense (unless you are overly big, overly strong, or have street experience from growing up) is a self-defense that stays within the guidelines of principle for the martial art you are training in (like good erect posture, weight on balls of feet, correct breathing, understanding of kuzushi, tsukuri, kake, knowing the waza correctly for example) and that is repeated hundreds if not thousands of times in order to make everything completely intuitive and automatic without thought.
One of the primary ideas behind such training is to embed the responses (of self-defense to an attack) so deeply within the subconscious mind that they override hesitation. For the 1st third, it improves the natural responses of self-defense, remembering that the first third already has the will to respond and run towards the gunfire so-to-speak. The natural response is already there, and the training only refines it and deepens its technical effectiveness.
For the 2nd third, the training improves and refines the natural response of self-defense but more importantly removes the hesitation in responding to the attack such that the defender needs less stimulus (abuse) to respond and go into action.
For the last 1/3rd, that portion of the bell curve that is locked into the Freeze response, it is less certain. Since Freeze is how they naturally respond then whether or not the training will be able to override it becomes questionable. With sufficient training (read, “LOTS and “LOTS”) then it is possible that their subconscious can take control enabling a response. The question then becomes what happens if their initial response fails (after they get hit in the face)? The odds are that they will again Freeze at the shock of the blow.
So what is the solution for those whose natural response is to Freeze? How do we as Sensei work them past that into effective responses and viable self-defense? The only solution that I've seen in 50 years on the mat is reps. And more reps and more training. And much more training and many more reps and not stopping at any point to assume that you now have all the responses programmed. Just stay with it. For how long? How about for your entire life ........
L.F. Wilkinson Kancho
The Aikibudokan
Houston, TX
February 26, 2021